Legal Opinion
Bingham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 7, 1929No. A-6740PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the district court of Garfield county on a charge of grand larceny, and their punishment fixed at 100 days in the state penitentiary for each of them.
The defendants assign numerous errors committed by the trial court, which they contend require a reversal of this case. The first error complained of by the defendants is that the prosecution should have been under section 2119, C. O. S. 1921, which reads as follows:
“Every person who shall take, steal and carry away any domestic fowl or fowls in the nighttime, from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- State v. BunchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
- Pilgrim v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Brower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. HinesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Sweet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Wilkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Douglas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.