Legal Opinion

Buckley Land Corp. v. Department of Natural Resources

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1989No. Docket No. 103854Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a circuit court order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant. We affirm.

Because plaintiffs issues concerning collateral estoppel, laches, adverse possession and perfection of title were not addressed by the trial court, we do not address them on appeal. Joe Dwyer, Inc v Jaguar Cars, Inc, 167 Mich App 672, 685; 423 NW2d 311 (1988).

We disagree with plaintiff’s argument that the trial court erroneously granted summary disposition on the basis that plaintiff’s suit was barred by the statute of limitations. Under current Michigan law it is true that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Dow v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Joe Dwyer, Inc v. Jaguar Cars, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Toll v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Fitschen v. OlsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API