Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Company v. Mitnik

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1944No. 17,317PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowell, P. J.

— The record of this cause appears by nunc pro tunc entry of the court below made on July 1, 1944, showing a trial by jury on April 26, 1944,- with return of the verdict on the same day and a further showing that appellants’ motion for a new trial was filed on June 21, 1944.

Appellant assigns two errors (a) that the court below erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence, (b) that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

The first assignment presents no question since it is independently assigned and not stated as one of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fausett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lavene v. FriedrichsIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. White v. State ex rel. HuffIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. EldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Income Guaranty Co. v. ZienlinskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Strate v. StrateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Lloyd's Motor Sales of Evansville, Inc. v. OhningIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Albert v. Cherry Grove Nursing Home, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Strate v. StrateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API