Legal Opinion

Nelsen v. City of Gridley

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1980No. Civ. 19073PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FINNEY, J. *

In the underlying action, plaintiff Vernon Nelsen sued defendant City of Gridley for injuries sustained when he struck a cable stretched across a city-owned paved road while riding his motorcycle. The theory of liability was that the cable constituted a known “dangerous condition” on city property. (See Gov. Code, § 835.) The court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant city on the basis of the immunity provision of section 846 of the Civil Code. Our review of the facts and the law leads us to reverse the judgment of the trial court.

We set forth the facts pertinent…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Baldwin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Ducey v. Argo Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kirkpatrick v. James M.California Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Fuller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Avila v. Citrus Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Delta Farms Reclamation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Thomas Robert Simpson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Watson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Keyes v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API