Legal Opinion

Peter Udo v. Merrick Garland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2022No. 20-70078PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PETER DONATUS UDO, No. 20-70078 Petitioner, Agency No. V. A208-309-125 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted November 18, 2021 San Francisco, California Filed May 4, 2022 Before: Sidney R. Thomas and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges, and Donald W. Molloy,* District Judge. Opinion by Judge McKeown * The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. 2…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Jamal Ali Farah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Shrestha v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Mario Ernesto Navas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Najmabadi v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lnu v. BlancheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
  2. Uc Encarnacion v. BondiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API