Legal Opinion
Castillo v. Argonaut Trading Agency, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 17, 1957PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Respondents have excepted to libelants’ amended libel. Libelants are nine alien seamen who were employed on the SS Argovan, a Canadian flag vessel, owned and operated by respondent Argonaut Navigation Company, Ltd., a Canadian corporation. The amended libel alleges that these seamen were falsely imprisoned when the vessel reached Adelaide, Australia, and that this imprisonment was caused by officers and men employed by respondents. Argonaut Trading Agency, Inc., a New York agent for Argonaut Navigation Company, Ltd., is joined as a respondent.
Three of the exceptions are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Strika v. Netherlands Ministry of Traffic, Directorate General of ShippingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Charter Shipping Co. v. Bowring, Jones & Tidy, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Redman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Kyriakos v. GoulandrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McGuire v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Richard Carroll v. Protection Maritime Insurance Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Gkiafis v. Steamship YiosonasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Harrington v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1990
- Abbott v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.