Legal Opinion
Branscomb v. Ploof Truck Lines, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 14, 1984No. AV-255PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WENTWORTH, Judge.
Branscomb seeks review of an order by which his motion for leave to file an amended counterclaim, cross-claim, and to add a party and file a third-party complaint was denied. We find that the court below erred in denying Branscomb’s motion, and we therefore reverse the order before us.1
Branscomb was the driver of an automobile in a multi-vehicle collision which also involved Ploof Truck Lines, Inc., and Carolina Freight Carriers Corp. Ploof filed a property damage action in Duval County, against both Branscomb and Carolina; Branscomb cross-claimed against Carolina, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Travelers Exp., Inc. v. AcostaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- CA Davis, Inc. v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Cheezem Dev. Corp. v. Maddox Roof Serv., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Bratcher v. WronkowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Walker v. SennDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bill Williams Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc. v. Haymarket Co-Op. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Chassan Pro. Wallcovering v. Victor FrankelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Fuente v. SOUTHERN OCEAN TRANSPORT, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Advanced Energy Concepts, Inc. v. WaughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987