International Strategies Group, Ltd. v. ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The motion court correctly applied an actual knowledge standard in deciding that plaintiffs allegations are insufficient to *475state a cause of action against defendant-respondent for aiding and abetting defendant-appellant’s alleged fraud (see National Westminster Bank v Weksel, 124 AD2d 144, 149 [1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 604 [1987]; see also JP Morgan Chase Bank v Winnick, 406 F Supp 2d 247, 252 n 4 [SD NY 2005]; cf. Williams v Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, L.L.P., 38 AD3d 219, 220 [2007]). We reject defendant-appellant’s argument that the documentary evidence conclusively establishes that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Westminster Bank USA v. WekselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v. WinnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Williams v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, L.L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by2 opinions
- Decana Inc. v. ContogourisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Roni LLC v. ArfaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010