Legal Opinion

International Strategies Group, Ltd. v. ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The motion court correctly applied an actual knowledge standard in deciding that plaintiffs allegations are insufficient to *475state a cause of action against defendant-respondent for aiding and abetting defendant-appellant’s alleged fraud (see National Westminster Bank v Weksel, 124 AD2d 144, 149 [1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 604 [1987]; see also JP Morgan Chase Bank v Winnick, 406 F Supp 2d 247, 252 n 4 [SD NY 2005]; cf. Williams v Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, L.L.P., 38 AD3d 219, 220 [2007]). We reject defendant-appellant’s argument that the documentary evidence conclusively establishes that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Westminster Bank USA v. WekselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. JP Morgan Chase Bank v. WinnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. Williams v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, L.L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Decana Inc. v. ContogourisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Roni LLC v. ArfaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API