Legal Opinion

Montgomery Cnty. v. Maloney

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 7, 2020No. 0632/18PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Montgomery County v. Maloney, No. 632, September Term 2018 Opinion by Kehoe, J. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION – REVIEW BY COURT – TRIAL DE NOVO When a party seeks judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Workers’ Compensation Commission, his opponent is not inescapably bound by the appealing party’s procedural preference. The language of Md. Code, Lab. & Empl. § 9-745(d), makes plain that “any party” can request, “in accordance with the practice in civil cases,” a de novo review of “any question of fact involved in the case.” Review by “essentially” de novo trial is available only for issues…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Central Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  2. Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Watson v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  4. Sica v. Retail Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Perdue v. BrittinghamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brady v. Walmart IncDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  2. Explorer Insurance Company v. Nagel Farm Service, Inc.; Penn Millers Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API