Henderson v. March
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*605OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants and respondent own abutting tracts of property. Appellants sought to eject respondent from a portion of the property to which appellants claim title. The district court entered judgment for respondent, based upon its determination that the parties or their predecessors in interest had established a boundary by “acquiescence.” This is an appeal from that judgment. Because we have determined that the evidence was not sufficient to establish a boundary by acquiescence, we reverse.
On March 16, 1979, appellants purchased the parcel of property abutting the property owned by…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Sceirine v. DensmoreNevada Supreme Court · 1971