Legal Opinion

Henderson v. March

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1984No. 15008Published

1Opinion of the Court

*605OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellants and respondent own abutting tracts of property. Appellants sought to eject respondent from a portion of the property to which appellants claim title. The district court entered judgment for respondent, based upon its determination that the parties or their predecessors in interest had established a boundary by “acquiescence.” This is an appeal from that judgment. Because we have determined that the evidence was not sufficient to establish a boundary by acquiescence, we reverse.

On March 16, 1979, appellants purchased the parcel of property abutting the property owned by…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sceirine v. DensmoreNevada Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API