Legal Opinion

State v. Wick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 2009No. 040532848; A129555PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The state petitions this court to reconsider its decision in State v. Wick, 216 Or App 404, 173 P3d 1231 (2007), rev den, 344 Or 671 (2008). In Wick, we remanded for resentencing on the state’s appeal but affirmed defendant’s convictions on cross-appeal. On the state’s appeal, we concluded that the sentencing court correctly declined to impose consecutive sentences based on its own judicial factfinding, but we remanded so that the court could afford defendant the option of a jury trial on consecutive sentencing factors under Oregon Laws 2005, chapter 463. The state now contends that, in light…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. State v. WickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API