Legal Opinion

Lalakea v. Laupahoehoe Sugar Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1940No. Nos. 2326 AND 2327PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a petition for a rehearing filed by Solomon K. Lalakea and Mollie Pang Lalakea. The opinion of the court, in respect of which a rehearing is prayed, is reported ante, p. 262.

The petition contains no recognized ground for a rehearing. It is patently an attempt to obtain, through the media of the “explanations,” the opinion of this court upon anticipated contingencies that may arise before the trial judge, upon the further trial of this case, in the event that he, differently from his predecessor, holds that the property, as to which estates for life were found to exist, could be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Tazewell v. HermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leslie v. Estate of TavaresHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cozine v. Hawaiian Catamaran, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API