Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Jerome v. Regents of the State University

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1897No. 3437PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from, the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto under section 289 of the code of 1887, and is prosecuted in the name of The People of the State of Colorado on the relation of Frank Jerome, a private citizen of the state, and a resident freeholder and taxpayer of Arapahoe county. Its object is to exclude the defendant corporation (the regents of the university of Colorado) from the exercise of a franchise alleged to be unlawfully usurped by it.

The material facts are not in controversy. By section 5 of article 8 of our constitution, the state university is located at Boulder, and under the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Little v. Regents of the University of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. People v. Trustees of Geneva CollegeNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. People ex rel. Byers v. Grand River Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  4. Regents of University of Nebraska v. McConnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R. R. v. People ex rel. Att'y-generalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Douglas M. Costle, State of Colorado Ex Rel. J. D. MacFarlane Petitioner-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. Sigma Chi Fraternity v. Regents of University of ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Landis v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. State ex rel. Fullerton v. Des Moines City RailwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API