Legal Opinion

Kuzan v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 25, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

deCORDOVA, J.S.C.

This matter comes before the court on an agreed statement of facts. Plaintiff seeks recovery of additional income-continuation benefits derived from a new policy issued in January 1983 to Patricia Graziano, the named insured, numbered 253X483042, by defendant Prudential. Plaintiff claims as driver of the named insured’s vehicle.

The parties agree that the applicable law is the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 et seq. *555Plaintiff contends that § 10 extends coverage to him for additional income-continuation benefits elected by Graziano the named…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. De Simone v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. Clendaniel v. NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API