Gelhaus & Brost, Inc. v. City of Medford
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
The property owners 1 appeal a summary judgment that sustains special assessments by the City of Medford. They contend that the amount assessed under a municipality’s police power may not exceed the value of the improvement to the property. We conclude that assessments made pursuant to a municipality’s police power are not limited to the value of the benefits to the property. Because the properties were benefited and the assessments were made upon a reasonable basis, we affirm.
On review of a summary judgment, the appellate court’s function is identical to that of the trial court. See…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schulenberg v. City of ReadingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- In Re Installation of Storm Sewers, Etc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- Steinbach v. Green Lake Sanitary DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Genrich v. City of Rice LakeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Lac La Belle Golf Club v. Village of Lac La BelleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Peterson v. City of New BerlinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Village of Egg Harbor v. Mariner Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.