Legal Opinion
Hill v. Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1995No. Nos. 94-6056, 94-6083, 94-6092, 94-6276PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge MICHAEL joined.
OPINION
DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:
Several inmates brought actions to challenge the constitutionality of a Virginia parole review policy, which provides for the *166deferral of parole review for up to three years for certain categories of inmates. After consolidating the actions, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the parole board, and the inmates appealed. Following oral argument we placed this case in abeyance pending…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Johnson v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Roller v. GunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Sharon Burnette v. Helen FaheyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Hamm v. Latessa, MCICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Shelton v. AngeloneDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.