Wilson v. Mehard
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 15, Oct. T., 1915, by Minnie F. Wilson, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., April T., 1913, No. 212, in equity dismissing exceptions to award of master in case of Nelson C. Wilson v. Jane A. Mehard, Charles E. Mehard, her husband, and Minnie F. Wilson. Bill in equity for partition. Exceptions to award by master in partition. Before Evans, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. The court dismissed the exceptions.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 15, Oct. T., 1915, by Minnie F. Wilson, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., April T., 1913, No. 212, in equity dismissing exceptions to award of master in case of Nelson C. Wilson v. Jane A. Mehard, Charles E. Mehard, her husband, and Minnie F. Wilson. Bill in equity for partition. Exceptions to award by master in partition. Before Evans, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. The court dismissed the exceptions. Minnie F. Wilson, appealed. •Error assigned was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The bill filed in this case was for the partition of real estate. The court had jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject itíatter. After a partition had been decreed, a master was appointed to divide the land into purparts. This he did, and reported his valuation of them to the court. His report having been absolutely confirmed, he gave personal notice to the parties interested that they should appear before him and bid over or accept or refuse the purparts at the valuation, or show cause why the same should not be sold. • In pursuance of this notice they appeared before him,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hauger v. HaugerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Powell v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936