Legal Opinion

Balentine v. Houtz

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 30, 2026No. N22C-11-236 CLSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOSEPH BALENTINE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) DAVID HOUTZ and ) C.A. No. N22C-11-236 CLS KRYSTA HAYLE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) Date Submitted: October 22, 2025 Date Decided: January 30, 2026 Upon Consideration of the Defendant’s Motion in Limine. DENIED. MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael R. Ippoliti, Esquire for IPPOLITI LAW GROUP, Attorney for Plaintiff. Karen M. Volker, Esquire for HECKLER & FRABIZZIO, P.A., Attorney for Defendants. SCOTT, J Before the Court is the defendants’ motion in limine to preclude the plaintiff from introducing special damages at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoag v. Amex Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Drejka v. Hitchens Tire Service Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  3. Minna v. Energy Coal S.P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  4. Christian v. Counseling Resource Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  5. Adams v. AidooSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API