Teipel v. Hilsendegen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Trespass on the case. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
When one sues to recover damages for a negligent injury, the gravamen of his complaint is that he „has been damnified by the wrongful and negligent action of the defendant without having contributed thereto by negligent conduct of his own. The absence of contributory negligence is therefore a part of his casé, and it is quite proper to say that he should show that he acted with due care. Le Baron v. Joslin 41 Mich. 313. But this only requires of him that he should put in evidence the facts and circumstances attending the injury, and if these show negligent conduct in the defendant from which…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Baron v. JoslinMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by33 opinions
- Gillett v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Smith v. Peninsular Car WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Adams v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Illinois Central Railroad v. NowickiIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Johnson v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.