Legal Opinion

Dake v. Painter

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 5, 1986No. 22489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that the family court committed error in reducing child support. We agree.

Under an order dated February 3, 1984, respondent was required to make child support payments in the amount of $260.00 every two weeks. The order under appeal reduced the level of child support to $225.00 payable twice a month. Because a reduction in child support was not requested by the pleadings, the family court erred in reducing the frequency and amount of the child support payments. Gainey v. Gainey, 279 S. C. 68, 301 S. E. (2d) 763 (1983); Bass v. Bass, 272 S. C. 177, 249 S. E. (2d) 905 (1978);…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bass v. BassSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  2. Gainey v. GaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Bryan v. BryanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. SCDSS Child Support Enforcement/Cindy Ruff v. MangleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API