Legal Opinion

City & County of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1966No. 4458PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

This is an appeal by John Patrick Betro and Violet G. Gilligan, intervenors in eminent domain proceedings. The trial court granted plaintiff’s (City and County of Honolulu, hereinafter referred to as the “City”) motion for summary judgment and allowed this interlocutory appeal.

The facts are not in dispute. The City brought the condemnation action on December 31, 1957. It sought to condemn the land in question for a public park and beach at Waikiki. An amended complaint was filed on February 21,1958. Before the amendment of the complaint, the property…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. Sunset Cemetery Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. Carlor Co. v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. State Ex Rel. Kashiwa v. ConeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  5. City & County of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Myers v. South Seas Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Myers v. South Seas Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API