Morburger v. United States
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
JAMES F. GORDON, District Judge.
This action came before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment filed October 17, 1968, under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.Code.
This controversy arises because the defendant disallowed the plaintiff a $4,044 deduction he took on his timely filed 1964 income tax return for intangible development and drilling costs of the Norton Coal Company oil and gas lease.
The uncontroverted affidavits' filed by plaintiff, the depositions and answers to interrogatories establish that there are no triable issues of fact.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. G. W. Van Keppel and Elizabeth Van KeppelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Alameda Realty Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
- Emerzian v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
- Sterling Oil & Gas Co. v. LucasDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1931
- Neel v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Madison Gas & Electric Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- Boone v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1973
- Madison Gas & Electric Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979