State v. Gordon
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Nugent, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Michael Gordon appeals from his conviction for possession of cocaine (R.C. 2925.11) following a no contest plea. Defendant assigns error in the court’s refusal to grant his motion to suppress the evidence of cocaine found by the police in a warrantless search of defendant’s car after a traffic stop. 1 We find no merit in appellant’s appeal and affirm the judgment below for the reasons hereinafter stated.
In reviewing the trial court’s ruling on appellant’s motion to suppress, we are duty bound to review the record, accepting the trial court’s findings of fact…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. KleinOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SemenchukOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. Hobbs, Unpublished Decision (7-28-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. HuddlestonOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. CookOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.