Legal Opinion

Baldwin Co. v. Berliner

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 30, 1946No. 24649Published

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a California corporation, seeks by this action to recover the amount heretofore paid by it as capital stock tax, penalty and interest for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1941. The tax was levied on the ground that the taxpayer corporation was carrying on or doing business within the meaning of Section 1200 of the Internal Revenue Code, the pertinent portion of which appears below.1

The plaintiff is a personal holding company, organized in March of 1941. It is the successor to the Baldwin Corporation, a Colorado corporation, whose assets consisted chiefly of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Magruder v. Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Realty Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Associated Furniture Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Section Seven Corp. v. AnglimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  4. Barker Bros. v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  5. Mt. Hebron Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API