Legal Opinion

Ray v. Webster

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 2, 1973No. 47683PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Presiding Judge.

"The grant of a summary judgment may be improper where, at the trial, the grant of a directed verdict may be proper, when the party making the motion for summary judgment is not required to carry the burden on the trial of the case.” Werbin & Tenenbaum v. Heard, 121 Ga. App. 147 (3) (173 SE2d 114). Accord: Morrow v. Thomason, 127 Ga. App. 309 (193 SE2d 256); E. Raymond Smith v. Allstate Ins. Co., 127 Ga. App. 571 (1) (194 SE2d 339); Jones v. Carr, 127 Ga. App. 332 (193 SE2d 255). In the instant case, construing all the evidence adduced on defendant’s motion for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burnette Ford, Inc. v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Werbin & Tenenbaum, Inc. v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Smith v. Sandersville Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Butler v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Morrow v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Winn-Dixie of Greenville v. RameyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Southern Protective Products Co. v. Leasing International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Baxter v. Georgia Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Charles A. Mueller Realty Co. v. Tucker Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Morgan v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API