Legal Opinion
Prosser v. Richman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 9, 1946PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff, a six-year-old boy, was struck by a car and seriously injured. The car was driven by Harold Kichman, the fifteen-year-old son of Emanuel and Kose Kichman. The father was in the car and it was registered in the name of the mother. The defendants admit that if Harold is liable both of his parents aré liable. The jury rendered a verdict of $18,000. The court granted a motion to set it aside unless a remittitur of $4500 was filed. None was filed and the verdict was set aside. The plaintiff and the defendants appealed from the ruling of the court on the motion, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cables v. Bristol Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Greeley v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Danahy v. CuneoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Kurtz v. Morse Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Carlson v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Bartholomew v. SchweizerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Slabinski v. DixSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Brower v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.