Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Brown

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1895No. Civil No. 391Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. R. E. Sloan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1DissentBaker, C. J.

I dissent. ■I protest against the ease and facility with which this court resolves itself into a trial court, and passes upon detached questions of fact, without having seen or heard the witnesses testify. The fact that the finding of the lower court is contrary to the judgment of this court, or this court, looking at the evidence as written, would come to a different conclusion from the trial court, or that the finding is apparently against the mere weight of the evidence, does not authorize a reversal of the judgment upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to support it. If there…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. H. Rosenbaum & Co. v. William H. Hayden & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API