Legal Opinion

Shapiro Bros. Factors Corp. v. Harlem Sugar Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1948Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pécora, J.

The question presented upon this motion to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice, is whether the return on March 9, 1942, of fifteen dollars of the goods sold to defendant by plaintiff’s assignor constituted a payment on account of the indebtedness, removing the bar of the Statute of Limitations. Plaintiff contends that the return of merchandise after the statement of the account constituted payment on account of the balance found due, so that the six-year Statute of Limitations commenced to run anew from the date of the last…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green v. . DisbrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Lawrence v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Scott v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Scott v. PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Scott v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API