Legal Opinion
Pinnacle Armor, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 2011No. 08-16209PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
Pinnacle Armor, Inc. (“Pinnacle”) produces armor designed to protect buildings, vehicles, and the human body. Among the primary customers for its body armor are local law enforcement agencies, who depend in large part upon a federal subsidy to purchase the body armor. This federal subsidy is conditioned on certification that the manufacturer’s body armor is compliant with standards set by the National Institute of Justice (“NIJ”), an agency of the Department of Justice. Pinnacle alleges that the NIJ’s decision to revoke certification of one of its products (1)…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- MacArio Bonilla v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Osu Student Alliance v. Ed RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- ASSE International, Inc. v. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Pedro Perez Perez v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Gilbert Hyatt v. Office of Mgt. and BudgetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.