Legal Opinion

Hunters Trail Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Stasik

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2021No. 29620PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Hunters Trail Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Stasik,

2021-Ohio-2224.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) HUNTERS TRAIL ACQUISITIONS, LLC C.A. No. 29620 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE BENJAMIN STASIK, et al. STOW MUNICIPAL COURT COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO Appellees CASE No. 2018-CVF-03179 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: June 30, 2021 TEODOSIO, Judge. {¶1} Hunters Trail Acquisitions, LLC (“Hunters Trail”) appeals from the judgment of the Stow Municipal Court. We affirm. I. {¶2} In October 2018, Hunters Trail filed a complaint…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Sheppard v. MackOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Bass-Fineberg Leasing, Inc. v. Modern Auto Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Hatcher-Hamilton v. HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Leiby v. Am. Title Solutions, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Silliman v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API