Legal Opinion

Guillermo Acosta and Jose Molina v. Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier, LLC

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided July 1, 2025No. 08-24-00099-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-24-00099-CV GUILLERMO ACOSTA and JOSE MOLINA, § Appeal from the Appellants, § 261st District Court v. § of Travis County, Texas UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and (TC# D-1-GN-24-001726) RASIER, LLC, § Appellees. § SUBSTITUTED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 We withdraw our opinion and judgment of February 28, 2025, and substitute the following opinion and corresponding judgment in their place. Appellants’ motion for rehearing is denied. This case involves a car accident that occurred on a trip arranged through a ride-sourcing cell phone…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ryland Group, Inc. v. HoodTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Timpte Industries, Inc. v. GishTexas Supreme Court · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API