Legal Opinion

Prasad v. County of Orange

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Howard Miller, J.

At the close of plaintiffs’ case, defendant County of Orange (County) moves to dismiss for failure to establish a prima facie case, based upon plaintiffs’ failure to establish that the County owed them a special duty and, in particular, failed to establish direct contact between the County and the plaintiffs, a necessary prong of the four-point test enunciated in Cuffy v City of New York (69 NY2d 255).

Cuffy (supra) concerns the duty of a municipality to provide police protection to a particular citizen. Even prior to Cuffy it had long been established that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. White v. GuarenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Garrett v. Holiday Inns, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Bartels v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boland v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. McLean v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. McLean v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2007
  4. R.B. v. County of OrangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API