Legal Opinion

Toney v. The Clorox Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 26, 2024No. 3:22-cv-05730Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 JEFFREY TONEY, CASE NO. 3:22-cv-05730-BHS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 THE CLOROX COMPANY, 11 Defendant. 12 13 This matter is before the Court on Defendant the Clorox Company’s motion for 14 summary judgment, Dkt. 31, and Plaintiff Jeffrey Toney’s motion for partial summary 15 judgment, Dkt. 32. Toney was employed at Clorox as a “customer team leader,” 16 responsible for selling certain Clorox products to Costco. In 2021, Clorox underwent a 17 reorganization and redefined the responsibilities of this role.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API