Legal Opinion

Bruce Humphrey v. American Motorists Insurance Company

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided March 27, 2003No. 11-02-00191-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TERRY McCALL, Justice.

This is a workers’ compensation case. The parties had a contested case hearing before the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) which determined that Bruce Humphrey, appellant, was not entitled to supplementary income benefits (SIBs) for the third, fourth, and fifth compensable quarters. The decision was affirmed by the Appeals Panel of the Commission. Appellant then filed suit for judicial review in district court. The jury determined that appellant had the ability to work during the third, fourth, and fifth compensable quarters; and the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Leitch v. HornsbyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Billy Stearns v. Billy Stewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2025
  2. In Re Texas Department of Transportation v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2023
  3. Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Inez Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API