United States v. DeLaurentiis
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR BILL OF PARTICULARS AND MOTION TO SUPPRESS
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
I. Motion for Bill of Particulars
The motion for bill of particulars on the conspiracy charge is DENIED. Chief Judge Woodcock of this District has recently set out the factors for considering such a motion, and I see no need to rework them:
Eclipsed by Rule 16 discovery requirements, motions for bills of particulars are seldom employed in modern federal practice. When bills of particulars are pursued, they need only be granted if the accused, in the absence of a more detailed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. JacquesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- In re World Imports, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014