Legal Opinion

Newcomb-Endicott Co. v. Fee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1911No. Docket No. 70PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Wayne; Codd, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Newcomb-Endicott Company against Robert L. Eee and others for goods sold and delivered. Plaintiff recovered and defendants appealed to the circuit court. A judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case originated in justice’s court, where the plaintiff recovered a judgment, and the defendants appealed to the circuit court.

In the first count of the declaration the defendants are sued as copartners, doing business as Fred J. Pound Company. It is alleged that they were indebted to the plaintiff for the price and value of a bill of goods amount*576ing to 1117.90, sold and delivered to the defendants by the plaintiff.

The second count alleges that the Fred J. Pound Company was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Michigan, and was indebted to the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Eaton v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Whipple v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Jhons v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Duray Development, LLC v. PerrinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Sun River Stock & Land Co. v. Montana Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Kosman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Bergy Bros. v. Zeeland Feeder Pig, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API