Legal Opinion

Dornfest v. Hilliard

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDickstein, J.

It is quite apparent that petitioner’s dismissal

at the end of his probationary period was mainly, if not solely predicated upon the incident at the staff meeting in August, 1950. The probationary term, provided for by section 9 of the Civil Service Law and subdivision 3 of section VIII of Rule V of the Rules of the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, is to allow the head of a department to ascertain the fitness of the probationer and to learn if he will be satisfactory in the position for which he was appointed. Until a candidate receives a permanent appointment, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Zieger v. WhiteheadNew York Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Croft v. McGinnisNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gribbin v. KennedyNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Adler v. LangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API