Legal Opinion

Carter v. Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 21, 2014No. 84/13Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sonia Carter, et al. v. Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust, No. 84, September Term, 2013, Opinion by Greene, J. WRONGFUL DEATH – ASBESTOS LITIGATION – APPORTIONMENT OF DAMAGES In Maryland, apportionment of damages among different causes is only appropriate where the injury in question is reasonably divisible among multiple causes. Where the injury in question is death caused by lung cancer, and where there is a single tortfeasor involved in the litigation, apportionment of damages is inappropriate. WRONGFUL DEATH – JOINDER OF USE PLAINTIFFS – STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Under the state of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Woods v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API