Legal Opinion
McKenzie v. Kennickell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 10, 1987No. Civ. A. 73-0974PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Senior District Judge:
The specific question presented and resolved in this Memorandum Opinion is whether or not class plaintiffs in this Title VII protracted litigation who have prevailed on the merits and clearly proved that black workers employed at the United States Government Printing Office (“GPO”) were victims of racial discrimination, are entitled to an interim award of attorneys’ fees and legal expenses. The interim award is requested pending a determination by the Court of their full entitlement. Counsel for the GPO have stubbornly resisted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rosenfeld v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Alfred U. McKenzie v. Ralph Kennickell, Jr., Public PrinterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Trout v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Trout v. GarrettDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- Morse/Diesel, Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.