Legal Opinion

Novak v. All City Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The indorsement attached to the comprehensive liability insurance policy and issued simultaneously with that policy by the respondent insurance company excludes insurance coverage for "Bodily Injury * * * arising out of (1) the named insured’s products”. The policy defines "named insured’s products” as "goods or products manufactured, sold, handled or distributed by the named insured”. So broad and clear a definition must be deemed to include food served to patron’s of the restaurant and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Government Employees Insurance v. KliglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metpath, Inc. v. Birmingham Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Pennsylvania General Insurance v. KielonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. New York Casualty Insurance v. Halley Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API