Legal Opinion

Moore v. Bank of Commerce

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1873PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The corporation liad the right tinder its charter to prescribe the mode and form of the transfer of its stock, and unless that mode and form were complied with; or offered to be complied with, the company could uot be held liable for a refusal to transfer.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The corporation liad the right tinder its charter to prescribe the mode and form of the transfer of its stock, and unless that mode and form were complied with; or offered to be complied with, the company could uot be held liable for a refusal to transfer. (Marlborough Manufacturing Co. vs. Smith, 2 Conn., 578 ; Northrop vs. Newton & Bridgeport Turnpike Co., 3 Conn., 544 ; The Oxford Turnpike Co. vs. Bnnnel, 6 Conn., 552 ; Sargent vs. Essex R. R. Co., 9 Pick., 204.) There was no official act done, or record made, of the alleged transaction between…

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge

The defendant is a corporation created by an act of the Missouri Legislature of the 14th of February, 1857, under the corporate name of “The St. Louis Building and Savings’ Association,” and by a subsequent act of the Legislature its name was changed to “The Bank of Commerce.”

In December 1860, Josiah G-. McClellan was. the owner of six shares of the stock of this Company, and applied to the plaintiff for a loan of $700, and proposed to pledge this stock as security for the loan. 'The plaintiff before he would make the loan called upon the defendant to ascertain how this stock stood, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ZeppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
  2. St. Louis Perpetual Insurance v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1845
  3. Chouteau Spring Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brinkerhoff-Farris Trust & Savings Co. v. Home Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Foster v. RowMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Wilson v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. State Bank v. FrameSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  5. Victor G. Bloede Co. v. BloedeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API