Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1954No. 18421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

1. While no motion has been made to dismiss the writ of error, it is nevertheless this court’s duty to consider and determine its jurisdiction in all cases brought up for review in which there may be any doubt as to the existence of such jurisdiction; and the present case is one calling for such inquiry. Brockett v. Maxwell, 200 Ga. 213 (36 S. E. 2d 638); Lanier v. Bailey, 206 Ga. 161 (56 S. E. 2d 515); Clay v. Smith, 208 Ga. 423 (67 S. E. 2d 235).

2. In this State a party to litigation may except either to a final judgment adverse to him or to one which, if it had been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ramey v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Ross v. MercerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Brockett v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Ray v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. Baldwin v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mavity v. Associates Discount Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  2. Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API