Legal Opinion

State v. Merrifield

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 3, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOLNIK, Justice.

After a jury trial in the Superior Court (Waldo County), the defendant, Gary Merri-field, was convicted of burglary, 17-A M.R. S.A. § 401 (1983), and of unlawful sexual contact, 17-A M.R.S. § 255 (1983). He contends on appeal that the evidence was insufficient to support his unlawful sexual contact conviction and that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the definition of “genitals.” 1 We affirm the judgments.

“Sexual contact” is defined by 17-A M.R. S.A. § 251(1)(D) (1983) as “any touching of the genitals, directly or through clothing, ... for the purpose…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GoyetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. State v. LyonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. State v. DudleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tungate v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. WinchenbachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. State v. BooneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. State v. DanaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  5. State v. NickersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API