State v. Lautzenheiser

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

James Paul Lautzenheiser (“defendant”) appeals his conviction and sentence. Viewed from the totality of circumstances, we find *28that the jury was not subject to impermissible coercion. We, therefore, affirm the trial court.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On March 11,1991, defendant was charged by indictment with one count of aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, a class 5 felony. Trial commenced on September 30, 1991. The trial court declared a mistrial on October 3, 1991, because the jury could not agree on a verdict. Retrial commenced on…