Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Campbell Soup Company, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 8, 1997No. 94-1435Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

*-21PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in Parts I.A and II., I dissent, respectfully, from Part I.B, for it is contrary to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), as implemented by the statute, to treat the rebated Mexican tax .as profit, and dutiable.

The issue is focussed on the Customs calculation of the computed value of tomato paste manufactured by the Campbell Soup subsidiary Sinalopasta in Mexico and exported to the United States. The computed value depends on the treatment of rebates of Mexican tax under the CEDIS program.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Suramerica de Aleaciones Laminadas, C.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. M&M/Mars Snackmaster Division of Mars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API