C&C Construction & Maintenance, Inc. v. Nales-Martinez
District Court, Virgin Islands
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHollar, Judge
I concur with the majority’s ruling that the Superior Court’s September 25, 2001 Order granting summary judgment, in part, in favor of Appellant, C&C Construction and Maintenance Inc., (“C&C” or “Appellant” or “Cross-Appellee”), is reviewable. I further concur with the majority’s ultimate decision, on the merits, to affirm the trial court’s partial summary judgment dismissing all counts of Appellee, Juan Nales-Martinez’s (“Martinez” or “Appellee” or “Cross-Appellant”) complaint except for the breach of contract (implied contract) cause of *1060action. I also concede that if the evidence was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Vance and Augusta Williams v. Martin Marietta Alumina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- National Labor Relations Board v. Chester Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Rockingham MacHine-lunex Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.