Legal Opinion

Finkelstein v. Cohen

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1961Published

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

Motion by the Sheriff of the City of New York to fix his poundage and to direct the payment thereof. Pursuant to a warrant of attachment, the Sheriff duly levied upon two stock certificates having a value in excess of third-party plaintiff’s claim. Thereafter, the action was discontinued and a settlement made. The warrant of attachment was annulled when the action was discontinued (Civ. Prac. Act, § 7, subd. 4). The annulment was equivalent to a vacatur of the warrant (Matter of Dempsey v. Lynch Co., 175 Misc. 710, affd. 261 App. Div. 829). Accordingly, the Sheriff is entitled to poundage…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. John A. Lynch Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Dempsey v. John A. Lynch Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Williams v. KahlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API