Legal Opinion

Mitchell & Son v. LaFayette Investment & Realty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 24, 1923No. 14166PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. While a promise to perform that which under an existing contract the promisor is already bound to the promisee to perform, constitutes no consideration for a contract, yet where in forming the new contract it is the expressed intention of the parties to abrogate and mutually rescind the first contract, which is executory on both sides, the promise in the new agreement is a sufficient consideration to support the new contract.

2. This being a suit against several defendants individually and a corporation promoted and organized by them, upon a contract in writing which the plaintiff alleges…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API