Legal Opinion

Mick v. Kroger Company

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1967No. 40182PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice UnPerwqqb

The principal issue in this case is whether a merchant can be said to have a duty to assist customers in carrying large packages of groceries from its store by virtue of the fact that it customarily did so. The circuit court of Franklin County and the Fifth District Appellate Court (73 Ill. App. 2d 155) ruled that the jury could properly find such a duty in this case. We granted defendant’s petition for leave to appeal.

Helen Mick instituted this action against the Kroger Company for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained when she fell while carrying a bag of groceries which she had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pauckner v. WakemIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Geraghty v. Burr Oak Lanes, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Donoho v. O'Connell's, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lasko v. MeierIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Olinger v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Alfaro v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Chisolm v. StephensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Mort v. WalterIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Zych v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API