Legal Opinion

Whitten v. Mead Paperboard Products

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 21, 1987No. Record No. 0766-86-3PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOON, J.

Austin S. Whitten appeals a decision of the Industrial Commission which denied his petition to recover benefits that accrued more than ninety days before he filed a change in condition application. Whitten contends that Rule 13(B) of the Rules of the Industrial Commission, which the commission relied upon when it dismissed his petition, conflicts with Code § 65.1-99 which permits a filing of an application for a change in condition up to twenty-four months from the last day for which compensation was paid. We disagree and affirm.

Code § 65.1-18 provides: “The Commission may make…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burlington Mills Corp. v. HagoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  2. Dan River Mills, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Sargent Electric Co. v. WoodallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. Baskerville v. Saunders Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
  5. Bristol Door & Lumber Co. v. HinkleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Specialty Auto Body v. CookCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  2. Crystal Oil Co., Inc. v. DotsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  3. Gordon v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  4. Graham v. Peoples Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  5. Gordon v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API