Whitten v. Mead Paperboard Products
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOON, J.
Austin S. Whitten appeals a decision of the Industrial Commission which denied his petition to recover benefits that accrued more than ninety days before he filed a change in condition application. Whitten contends that Rule 13(B) of the Rules of the Industrial Commission, which the commission relied upon when it dismissed his petition, conflicts with Code § 65.1-99 which permits a filing of an application for a change in condition up to twenty-four months from the last day for which compensation was paid. We disagree and affirm.
Code § 65.1-18 provides: “The Commission may make…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burlington Mills Corp. v. HagoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- Dan River Mills, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Sargent Electric Co. v. WoodallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Baskerville v. Saunders Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
- Bristol Door & Lumber Co. v. HinkleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Specialty Auto Body v. CookCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Crystal Oil Co., Inc. v. DotsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Gordon v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Graham v. Peoples Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Gordon v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.